Article 89 : Monitoring Actions
The AI Office has the power to monitor how well companies using general-purpose AI models are following the rules set out in this Regulation. This includes checking if they're sticking to approved codes of practice. Companies that use these AI models (downstream providers) can also complain if they think the rules have been broken. They need to provide details about who they're complaining about, what they think has gone wrong, which part of the Regulation has been breached, and why they believe this. They can also include any other relevant information they've found themselves.
Generated by CLaiRK, edited by us.
NOTE: This translation is a machine-generated translation. It is not the official translation provided by the European Parliament. When the AI Act is published in the official journal, the machine-generated translations will be replaced by the official translations.
1. For the purpose of carrying out the tasks assigned to it under this Section, the AI Office may take the necessary actions to monitor the effective implementation and compliance with this Regulation by providers of general-purpose AI models, including their adherence to approved codes of practice.
2. Downstream providers shall have the right to lodge a complaint alleging an infringement of this Regulation. A complaint shall be duly reasoned and indicate at least:
(a) the point of contact of the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned;
(b) a description of the relevant facts, the provisions of this Regulation concerned, and the reason why the downstream provider considers that the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned infringed this Regulation;
(c) any other information that the downstream provider that sent the request considers relevant, including, where appropriate, information gathered on its own initiative.
Feedback – We are working to improve this tool. Please send feedback to Taylor Jones at taylor@futureoflife.org
